substantial ?
+3
zenzen
LauraJ
aza
7 posters
Page 1 of 1
substantial ?
often read, on zen forums, posted seeking as though something substantial through zen as though zen is substantial...even when people post writing as though there's nothing substantial, the approach still remains as though there is
zen isn't a religious ideology...what seems to be substantial ?
zen isn't a religious ideology...what seems to be substantial ?
aza- Number of posts : 10
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
For you aza, is Zen a philosophy, a religion, or a way of life?
It is hard to apply words to Zen, I think. Perhaps that's why it's always interested me. Though the practice is beyond words at times, the sutras are substantial (if complex at times). There have been great masters, like Thich Nhat Hanh. I don't always understand their teachings because it's not really how my mind works.
But ultimately I agree, that it's tougher on Zen practitioners to discuss on forums.
It is hard to apply words to Zen, I think. Perhaps that's why it's always interested me. Though the practice is beyond words at times, the sutras are substantial (if complex at times). There have been great masters, like Thich Nhat Hanh. I don't always understand their teachings because it's not really how my mind works.
But ultimately I agree, that it's tougher on Zen practitioners to discuss on forums.
Re: substantial ?
haven't thought zen a philosophy, a religion, or a way of life...that would be thinking zen is something to think about, try to follow. try to practice, try living
great you don't understand ...what means "it's not really how my mind works" ?
yes there's not as much discussing, but often read posted trying to write which is thought is a zen way of writing...sometimes people use that, like some people use suttas, for trying proving they're right...often there's verbal tug-a-wars, hehe...is very funny reading
great you don't understand ...what means "it's not really how my mind works" ?
yes there's not as much discussing, but often read posted trying to write which is thought is a zen way of writing...sometimes people use that, like some people use suttas, for trying proving they're right...often there's verbal tug-a-wars, hehe...is very funny reading
aza- Number of posts : 10
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
I see, so you practice in everything you do. That is great
When I say it's not really how my mind works, I mean sometimes when I read what people write about Zen, it seems very abstract. It takes me a long time to work out what someone is saying, and it makes me feel sort of dumb sometimes! But really the concepts are the same across the traditions, it's just different approaches.
Yes, people try to express in words what can be very difficult. And some things are beyond words, I know. When people use sutras to prove their points, I respect that, but you're right that it can turn into a battle too :fight:
But I still love to read about Zen, and to listen to people who express how they live out their practice in many parts of life.
When I say it's not really how my mind works, I mean sometimes when I read what people write about Zen, it seems very abstract. It takes me a long time to work out what someone is saying, and it makes me feel sort of dumb sometimes! But really the concepts are the same across the traditions, it's just different approaches.
Yes, people try to express in words what can be very difficult. And some things are beyond words, I know. When people use sutras to prove their points, I respect that, but you're right that it can turn into a battle too :fight:
But I still love to read about Zen, and to listen to people who express how they live out their practice in many parts of life.
Re: substantial ?
One more Zen fool reporting in!
This is what I've noticed about Internet forums: The amount of words does not seem to be proportional to the amount of understanding of zen digeridoo.
The more one explains it the farther he is from it. Yet, it's not completely hopeless. Someone somewhere might get interested and look for himself.
This is what I've noticed about Internet forums: The amount of words does not seem to be proportional to the amount of understanding of zen digeridoo.
The more one explains it the farther he is from it. Yet, it's not completely hopeless. Someone somewhere might get interested and look for himself.
zenzen- Number of posts : 52
Location : Finland
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
But...Where would we be without substance?
termite- Number of posts : 5
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
termite wrote:But...Where would we be without substance?
Insubstantial - somewhere?
Who is the 'we' which may 'be' and yet lack 'substance'?
Any is there a 'where' to be?
If 'we' lack the substance of inherent existence then 'we' must look 'somewhere' else for 'tat tvam asi' .
I'm currently looking for it in a bag of Maltesers.
Dharanidhar- Number of posts : 37
Location : Manas
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
Dharanidhar wrote:termite wrote:But...Where would we be without substance?
Insubstantial - somewhere?
Who is the 'we' which may 'be' and yet lack 'substance'?
Any is there a 'where' to be?
If 'we' lack the substance of inherent existence then 'we' must look 'somewhere' else for 'tat tvam asi' .
I'm currently looking for it in a bag of Maltesers.
Yeah, I wonder what kind of substance that would be then?
Some have said it's not the exact directions but the search that matters.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
zenzen- Number of posts : 52
Location : Finland
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
Not having practiced any other kind of Buddhism but Zen/Chan, I often wonder what it is that is so puzzling to students of other Buddhist traditions? Zen/Chan is just what it is.
My experience with it has been that at its core it teaches:
"A special transmission outside the scriptures,
Not founded upon words and letters;
By pointing directly to [one's] mind
It lets one see into [one's own true] nature and [thus] attain Buddhahood."
The part about pointing directly to mind is where the practice is -- and that is difficult to describe without using self-referential terms. So, Zen practitioners are caught in an apparent paradox if they refuse to use plain English (or whatever language) to discuss and describe this practice. It can get pretty funny sometimes, and frustrating.
:ufo:
My experience with it has been that at its core it teaches:
"A special transmission outside the scriptures,
Not founded upon words and letters;
By pointing directly to [one's] mind
It lets one see into [one's own true] nature and [thus] attain Buddhahood."
The part about pointing directly to mind is where the practice is -- and that is difficult to describe without using self-referential terms. So, Zen practitioners are caught in an apparent paradox if they refuse to use plain English (or whatever language) to discuss and describe this practice. It can get pretty funny sometimes, and frustrating.
:ufo:
essie- Number of posts : 3
Registration date : 2009-01-11
Re: substantial ?
So I am a zennie myself if anything. I'm not quite sure about that either so let's skip that part just to be sure.
Oh yeah, I've chatted in zenguide forum for a few years and it's sometimes quite wacky. I mean, it seems that only a few of zen practitioners are interested in intellectual pursuits whatsoever. Not even in the extent that they would discuss different meditative techniques or at least chit chat for the fun of it. Zen people seem to be most interested in spending their time without conceptual knowledge whatsoever if possible. Thus, writing in forums would be something entirely useless for the practice because it's a disturbance in the quiet mind. In a way this is justified and true, at least from my point of view. On the other hand I see this to be a one-sided view, let me explain:
We may assume that conceptual, intellectual pursuits are useless folly in a sense because they always fail to grasp the real world. Okay, that's easy enough to understand. But what most of us zennies forget is that the folly may be entertaining like a good joke. Think about it: you're having a good dream and all of your desires are about to be filled. In the moment when you're about to get the reward the dream changes. This is so with waking life as well: When one chases the desires he becomes hungry again as soon as those desires are fulfilled. It's like the whole life was running to a train in a rush only to see it leaving in the front of your nose. So, if you ask me the nature of the whole conceptual world is full of slight irony. So isn't it just and fair to laugh along a little?
This is simply my personal opinion so don't take it too seriously. I'm an optimist you see.
Oh yeah, I've chatted in zenguide forum for a few years and it's sometimes quite wacky. I mean, it seems that only a few of zen practitioners are interested in intellectual pursuits whatsoever. Not even in the extent that they would discuss different meditative techniques or at least chit chat for the fun of it. Zen people seem to be most interested in spending their time without conceptual knowledge whatsoever if possible. Thus, writing in forums would be something entirely useless for the practice because it's a disturbance in the quiet mind. In a way this is justified and true, at least from my point of view. On the other hand I see this to be a one-sided view, let me explain:
We may assume that conceptual, intellectual pursuits are useless folly in a sense because they always fail to grasp the real world. Okay, that's easy enough to understand. But what most of us zennies forget is that the folly may be entertaining like a good joke. Think about it: you're having a good dream and all of your desires are about to be filled. In the moment when you're about to get the reward the dream changes. This is so with waking life as well: When one chases the desires he becomes hungry again as soon as those desires are fulfilled. It's like the whole life was running to a train in a rush only to see it leaving in the front of your nose. So, if you ask me the nature of the whole conceptual world is full of slight irony. So isn't it just and fair to laugh along a little?
This is simply my personal opinion so don't take it too seriously. I'm an optimist you see.
zenzen- Number of posts : 52
Location : Finland
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
Words are sometimes feeling like overwhelming and too much analytical reflection brings mind out of balance. I learn flexibility in single pointed or concentration and analytical in balance if not there is degeneration of calm abiding. And then back to analytical.zenzen wrote:One more Zen fool reporting in!
This is what I've noticed about Internet forums: The amount of words does not seem to be proportional to the amount of understanding of zen digeridoo.
The more one explains it the farther he is from it. Yet, it's not completely hopeless. Someone somewhere might get interested and look for himself.
Water by water and reflection. Maybe in Zen one does something like that? And flashlights by directly pointing ( in Koans) to switch the wrong view in absorption of emptiness?
muni- Number of posts : 449
Registration date : 2009-01-27
Re: substantial ?
no, no practingDrolma wrote:I see, so you practice in everything you do. That is great
there's a dumb ?When I say it's not really how my mind works, I mean sometimes when I read what people write about Zen, it seems very abstract. It takes me a long time to work out what someone is saying, and it makes me feel sort of dumb sometimes! But really the concepts are the same across the traditions, it's just different approaches.
what concepts ?
But I still love to read about Zen, and to listen to people who express how they live out their practice in many parts of life.
aza- Number of posts : 10
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
looking for 'zen fool' but haven't foundzenzen wrote:One more Zen fool reporting in!
zen digeridoo.
aza- Number of posts : 10
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
hehetermite wrote:But...Where would we be without substance?
aza- Number of posts : 10
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
yeyyyy wackyzenzen wrote:Oh yeah, I've chatted in zenguide forum for a few years and it's sometimes quite wacky.
aza- Number of posts : 10
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
Oh you too? What nic?aza wrote:yeyyyy wackyzenzen wrote:Oh yeah, I've chatted in zenguide forum for a few years and it's sometimes quite wacky.
zenzen- Number of posts : 52
Location : Finland
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
muni
analyse what ? ...what for ?muni wrote:I learn flexibility in single pointed or concentration and analytical in balance if not there is degeneration of calm abiding. And then back to analytical.
switch ?switch the wrong view in absorption of emptiness?
aza- Number of posts : 10
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
Analytical reflection or meditation is in Tibetan Buddhism used like to bring in balance insight and calm abiding. Analyze for example emptiness of all phenomena, emptiness of self. Then concentration meditation follows.
The use of both are bringing a vast mental flexibility.
Also I use it when there is a form of clinging or solid idea in moments of daily life. This as reminder of wrong view and the click in no inherent dependence -view.
I am wondering Zen has an approach like this?
Not sure switch is a good word. The click of grasping to real existence, to insight.
The use of both are bringing a vast mental flexibility.
Also I use it when there is a form of clinging or solid idea in moments of daily life. This as reminder of wrong view and the click in no inherent dependence -view.
I am wondering Zen has an approach like this?
Not sure switch is a good word. The click of grasping to real existence, to insight.
muni- Number of posts : 449
Registration date : 2009-01-27
Re: substantial ?
zenzen wrote:Oh you too? What nic?aza wrote:yeyyyy wackyzenzen wrote:Oh yeah, I've chatted in zenguide forum for a few years and it's sometimes quite wacky.
lehish
aza- Number of posts : 10
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
"emptiness of all phenomena"...so what's to analyse ?muni wrote:Analytical reflection or meditation is in Tibetan Buddhism used like to bring in balance insight and calm abiding. Analyze for example emptiness of all phenomena, emptiness of self. Then concentration meditation follows.
The use of both are bringing a vast mental flexibility.
"emptiness of self"...so what self ?
zen directI am wondering Zen has an approach like this?
oh wordsNot sure switch is a good word. The click of grasping to real existence, to insight.
aza- Number of posts : 10
Registration date : 2008-12-28
Re: substantial ?
Analytical approach to look in detail what is meant with emptiness of the "existences". Deep reflection.aza wrote:"emptiness of all phenomena"...so what's to analyse ?muni wrote:Analytical reflection or meditation is in Tibetan Buddhism used like to bring in balance insight and calm abiding. Analyze for example emptiness of all phenomena, emptiness of self. Then concentration meditation follows.
The use of both are bringing a vast mental flexibility.
"emptiness of self"...so what self ?zen directI am wondering Zen has an approach like this?oh wordsNot sure switch is a good word. The click of grasping to real existence, to insight.
Zen direct? Absorbed in daily mandala is perfect.
muni- Number of posts : 449
Registration date : 2009-01-27
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum